Everyone knows that drama, music, and art rely heavily on "borrowing" from others, and it's ok! People have been doing it for thousands of years. And even though purists (a.k.a. douchebag artistes) turn their nose up at it and spend a whole lifetime attempting to invent something new, they can't escape it.
Now, buckle up, my
Why don't we remake the bad movies? You know, aside from the crappy remakes. You can just leave those alone. Don't you ever watch a bad movie, and just want to yell cut and change things up? I've seen some movies that initially had a great plot, then the writer(s) had a stroke and started typing up complete nonsense and deviating from the original story line*. Or the movies that look like someone has watched every "great" movie of a genre, then they believe that by combining all the best moments that made each individual movie stand out into their movie, it'll be an instant masterpiece. Or the movies that just don't know when to cut a scene. I know, it's the funniest scene in the movie, but it has no business being there. Sometimes you have to kill your babies. And I don't mean that in a drown your kid in the bathtub way. It's more of a teen abortion kind of way. Did I just joke about abortion? You betcha! It's cool guys, my mom prays for me.
First on the list? When in Rome. I watched this movie knowing fully well that it would be terrible, and it was. First remake idea? KEEP IT IN ROME. I mean, come on! Don't put a city in the title and then base it in yet another city. It's not like you needed to move it to a more interesting city. Rome, from what I have heard, is pretty awesome, and it's in the most awesome country in Europe! Again, I have not been there, but I am Italian, so I've been raised on a bias.
Then we can hit up the sequels. Just because the first movie was a success does not mean you can recycle the jokes and the premise and expect it to be as successful. As a basic writing exercise, why don't you treat the movie like a tv show? Those writers have to put the same characters in new premises week after week, and usually, it takes about five seasons before the writing gets sloppy and the characters turn into caricatures of their former selves. I haven't seen the Hangover 2, but I assume it will not go off as well as the first. Why do I think that? Hmm, let's see...maybe because they lost someone again, and Stu has something permanently damaging done to his face again, and Mike Tyson is in it, AGAIN! Plus, it looks like Ken Jeong has a bigger role, and I just can't pay money for that, I just can't.
What about Gigli? Didn't see it, but I heard it was bad. So, someone shouldgo back and work on that. Pretty much just remake every movie JLo was in, and start it off with casting a better actress. Done. Classic!
Ok, there are tons more that I can write all day about, but I am at work and they are paying me to pay attention to customers, whether I want to or not. But think about it, wouldn't you be just a little curious to see a remake of a bad film? My idea probably won't ever get off the ground, you know because it's more about artistic integrity and not about making any money whatsoever, but it's a noble thought. Yes, I did just deem my thought as noble. What of it? I don't hear any of you praising me. I've got to do it on my own or I'd be a mess of insecurities.
*To all you writers out there, I am aware that scripts can be butchered by horrible producers, and I'm not really blaming you. I'm blaming the scabs who are hired to "rework" your script. Or maybe I'll just blame it on the a-a-a-a-a-alcohol.